Skip to content

[spi device] remove _spi_bus_device_control#5898

Merged
Guozhanxin merged 1 commit into
RT-Thread:masterfrom
mysterywolf:spidev
May 30, 2022
Merged

[spi device] remove _spi_bus_device_control#5898
Guozhanxin merged 1 commit into
RT-Thread:masterfrom
mysterywolf:spidev

Conversation

@mysterywolf

@mysterywolf mysterywolf commented Apr 30, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

拉取/合并请求描述:(PR description)

[
_spi_bus_device_control 该函数没有实际被使用到予以移除

一些设备框架的错误码返回值处理不是很仔细,在没有任何有效操作的情况下,也会返回RT_EOK,这对用户的误导非常大。
今天在调试的时候顺道发现了spi control存在类似的问题。
此外在论坛上也有此类问题的反应:http://bbs.eeworld.com.cn/thread-1196113-1-1.html

考虑在4.1.1之前对此类问题进行一次摸排

]

以下的内容不应该在提交PR时的message修改,修改下述message,PR会被直接关闭。请在提交PR后,浏览器查看PR并对以下检查项逐项check,没问题后逐条在页面上打钩。
The following content must not be changed in the submitted PR message. Otherwise, the PR will be closed immediately. After submitted PR, please use a web browser to visit PR, and check items one by one, and ticked them if no problem.

当前拉取/合并请求的状态 Intent for your PR

必须选择一项 Choose one (Mandatory):

  • 本拉取/合并请求是一个草稿版本 This PR is for a code-review and is intended to get feedback
  • 本拉取/合并请求是一个成熟版本 This PR is mature, and ready to be integrated into the repo

代码质量 Code Quality:

我在这个拉取/合并请求中已经考虑了 As part of this pull request, I've considered the following:

  • 已经仔细查看过代码改动的对比 Already check the difference between PR and old code
  • 代码风格正确,包括缩进空格,命名及其他风格 Style guide is adhered to, including spacing, naming and other styles
  • 没有垃圾代码,代码尽量精简,不包含#if 0代码,不包含已经被注释了的代码 All redundant code is removed and cleaned up
  • 所有变更均有原因及合理的,并且不会影响到其他软件组件代码或BSP All modifications are justified and not affect other components or BSP
  • 对难懂代码均提供对应的注释 I've commented appropriately where code is tricky
  • 本拉取/合并请求代码是高质量的 Code in this PR is of high quality
  • 本拉取/合并使用formatting等源码格式化工具确保格式符合RT-Thread代码规范 This PR complies with RT-Thread code specification

Comment thread components/drivers/spi/spi_dev.c Outdated

return RT_EOK;
return result;
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

因为在 SPI 驱动框架里,配置 SPI 总线设备用的是驱动里实现的 struct rt_spi_ops 里的 configure,
在这里实现的是 struct rt_device_ops 里的 control,其实并没有用到。
是不是可以在 init 时把这个ops 置 NULL,就直接不用实现了。

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

已删除掉这个函数

@mysterywolf mysterywolf added in progress PR/issue in progress. and removed v4.1.1 labels May 17, 2022
@mysterywolf mysterywolf changed the title [spi device] 修正设备框架错误码胡乱返回正确的问题 [spi device] remove _spi_bus_device_control May 29, 2022
@mysterywolf mysterywolf requested a review from Guozhanxin May 29, 2022 23:53
@mysterywolf mysterywolf added v4.1.1 and removed in progress PR/issue in progress. labels May 29, 2022
@Guozhanxin Guozhanxin added the +1 Agree +1 label May 30, 2022
@Guozhanxin Guozhanxin merged commit c52c1c5 into RT-Thread:master May 30, 2022
@mysterywolf mysterywolf deleted the spidev branch May 30, 2022 10:06
@ShermanShao

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1

@mysterywolf mysterywolf added the +2 Agree +2 label May 31, 2022
levizh added a commit to levizh/rt-thread that referenced this pull request May 31, 2022
…hc32_pr

* 'master' of https://github.com/RT-Thread/rt-thread:
  Hc32 pr (RT-Thread#6003)
  [add] winsock implement on windows simulator. (RT-Thread#6010)
  [spi device] remove _spi_bus_device_control (RT-Thread#5898)
  [net][lwip] Support windows simulator (RT-Thread#5993)
  [componnets][pin]add pin operate command in MSH (RT-Thread#5892)
  [device][adc] implement adc_get_vref (RT-Thread#5988)
  [drivers][hwcrypto] Correct function return value definition (RT-Thread#5984)
  [STM32][RTC] add support for STM32L0 series. (RT-Thread#5994)
  Fix bug when restarting and getting interrupts that are not processed. (RT-Thread#5997)
  [kernel][timer] fixed bug (RT-Thread#6004)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

+1 Agree +1 +2 Agree +2

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants